Learning Innovation Lab
Re-imagining Education Through Innovative Designs for Learning
  • Home
  • Innovators and Big Questions
  • Tools
  • IN THE NEWS
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Master Innovator Portal
    • Cohort 22
Picture
Back to Inspiration
Picture

 Research      Blades:     Home        Learn More        Standards        Inspiration        About the Author


How does infusing art and engineering into Language Arts
​impact language?

The following video summarizes the research performed in my classroom in the fall of 2020.
PictureCreated by S. Blades in Canva.com
Looking for a quicker read about my research? This executive summary provides a shorter and more digestible document without having to read it all.

Picture
Way back in my undergraduate studies, the works of great names like Vygotsky and Piaget intrigued me. Then as I began teaching and learned about Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) and Guided Language Acquisition Design (GLAD) I learned about research by trailblazers like Echevarria, Krashen and Collier & Thomas. 
Isn't it ironic that those foundational names influenced my research and literature review? 

Picture
My Initial Driving Question:  
Can infusing creativity increase student discourse?
It was inspired by my desire to incorporate art and engineering.
It also sparked reflection and research on who is doing the talking in my classroom.
This article about who's doing the talking showed most classrooms have 89% teacher talk vs 11% student talk. This was echoed in the book Visible Learning for Teachers, John Hattie, 2012. I dove deep into studying aspects of creativity and student discourse for the semester. Then considering the data I gathered, I modified my driving question for the following semester in order to better meet the needs of my students as well as respond to the evolution of pandemic virtual learning. With the input of my colleagues and professors, my driving question became:

Does cross-curricular instruction combining art or engineering design and English Language Arts change student discourse? 
This question kept the focus on art and engineering as tools to possibly improve language!  

Picture
Design Process
Picture
Support and Next Steps
Academic Research Poster 
Background and Need  
In the Fall of 2017, the National Center for Education Statistics published that five million English Language Learners (ELLs) were enrolled in public K-12 schools in the United States. Five million ELLs in the United States was 10.1% of the national enrollment at that time. By contrast,  California has 19.2% of students were English Language Learners which was the highest percentage in the nation. Texas followed closely at 18% and Nevada with 17.1% (National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2017). The data from the 2019-2020 school year for the district studied in this research had 46.3% of its students identified as ELLs (DataQuest, 2020).   

Students who are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) in California are assessed using an evaluation entitled the English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPAC) (California Department of Education, 2019) to measure progress with learning English. The ELPAC is sectioned into four domains to measure language progress: listening, speaking, reading and writing. Scores in each domain are ranked using a four tiered system. 
  1. Level one:  Beginning to Develop, the lowest performance level.
  2. Level two:  Somewhat Developed. 
  3. Level three:  Moderately Developed. 
  4. Level four, Well Developed. 
When students demonstrate adequate progress, they are classified as a fluent English speaker, reader and writer.  

Looking at 2018-2019 ELPAC data for first graders, specifically focused on the SPEAKING section of the assessment:
State = 49.68% scored in the lower ranges (levels 1 or 2)
District featured in my research = 40.12% scored in levels 1 or 2
School featured in my research = 95.24% scored in levels 1 or 2
This meant that only 4.76% of the ELLs were making significant progress towards becoming proficient in speaking English at the school of study.

It is clear from the national and statewide data that the English Language Arts (ELA) curricula and methods for supporting ELLs must be modified to support closing the gaps in performance for these students. Marino (2018) found that the achievement gap could be significantly reduced when art education was specifically focused on the needs of English Language Learners. The research also suggested that combining inquiry-based instruction with direct and explicit vocabulary teaching could increase the English Language Learners’ performance in academic language (Kanner, 2020). Additionally, research on the brain suggested that the brain was constantly fostering new neural pathways and that learning was strengthened when the neurons were activated in multiple areas of the brain (Wolfe, 2014).

Would the infusion of arts and/or engineering design activities into standard English Language Arts (ELA) curriculum delivery yield higher percentages of ELL students who demonstrated adequate progress towards being classified as a fluent English speaker, reader and writer, due to the activation of multiple parts of the brain and multiple methods for learning? 

Research Plan  
Two data cycles were conducted over the course of a semester (three months). 
​A data cycle consisted of collecting student responses about a prompt or specific vocabulary as a "pre" and "post".


"Pre" used only the district issued curriculum.
Student responses were recorded using Seesaw.
Data was analyzed and recorded.

​
"Post" students received infused learning using art and engineering.
Students were asked to respond to the same prompts as the "pre".
Data was analyzed and recorded.
Then both data sets were analyzed.

The first data cycle was on the topic of learning from informational text about birds.
The second data cycle was from a fictional text about a rainy day. 


© 2012-2014, 2015-2019 All Rights Reserved           
Learning Innovation Lab, Leading Innovation Lab and Teaching Innovation Lab (formerly LearnovationLab & TILTnet) are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.  Based on a work formerly at learnovationlab.org.